Legal Opinion
Foothill Capital Corp. v. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Midcom Communications, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 10, 2000No. 2:99-cv-71661PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, District Judge.
The parties in this bankruptcy appeal essentially dispute whether it was proper for the Appellant, Foothill Capital Corporation (“Foothill”), to receive a prioritized payment of a monetary premium from the debtor, Midcom Communications, Inc. (“Midcom”), under the terms of a pre-bankruptcy financing agreement between these two companies. The Appellees, the Official Unsecured Creditors’ Committee of Midcom Communications, Inc. (“Committee”), have sought and subsequently obtained an order from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Aida Lucilla Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar, Debtor. Aida Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar v. Willard BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colonial Bank v. Freeman (In Re Pacific Forest Products Corp.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- In Re Manchester Gas Storage, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
- Holmes v. Citigroup Investments AgriFinance (In Re Holmes)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
- In Re Anc Rental Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005