Legal Opinion

Giles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1992PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

On Return to Remand

This cause was remanded to the trial court in order to conduct a new sentencing hearing, after the Alabama Supreme Court determined that the trial court improperly gave the deadlocked jury a charge pursuant to Allen v. United States,164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 152, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896); during the sentencing phase, Ex parte Giles, 554 So.2d 1089 (Ala. 1987). In his last appeal, Giles v. State, 554 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), affirmed in part,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Porter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ex Parte LogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte RieberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API