Legal Opinion

Herren v. Kansas City Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1916No. 13548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Sheeks, J., entered December 31, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a contractor’s bond, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J. —

The plaintiffs, as copartners, seek recovery from the Kansas City Casualty Company upon a bond executed by it in compliance with Rem. Code, § 1159, to secure subcontractors and others furnishing labor and material for the carrying on of certain public work. Trial before the superior court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant, casualty company, has appealed. The contractor, Spokane *78Paving & Construction Company,’which' executed the bond as principal, while also named as á defendant in the complaint, was not served…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Strandell v. MoranWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Installment Building & Loan Co. v. WentworthWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rodgers v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. Interlocking Tile Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API