Legal Opinion
Standard Accident Insurance v. Interlocking Tile Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1932No. 23233. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
H. Grdbrandson & Son entered into a contract with the county of Snohomish, by and through its board of county commissioners, for the construction of the Snohomish county detention home. The Standard Accident Insurance Company became surety for the contractors, giving the usual statutory bond, under the provisions of Bern. Comp. Stat., §§ 1159 to 1161. The Interlocking Tile Corporation entered into and performed a subcontract with Gfulbrandson & Son for the furnishing and installation of the tile roof on the building, in the sum of $860.
The building was completed and formally accepted by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Strandell v. MoranWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Coffman, Dobson & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932