Legal Opinion
Stacey v. Peed
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 4, 2013No. 1120661PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STUART, Justice.
On August 8, 2010, George Patrick Stacey and Innovative Treasury Systems, Inc. (“I.T.S.”), filed a complaint in the Baldwin Circuit Court against Anthony Lee Peed.1 Stacey and I.T.S. alleged that Peed owed them $161,365.78 plus interest based upon three claims asserted in the complaint— breach of contract, account stated, and money lent. Peed answered the complaint, denying that he was indebted to Stacey and I.T.S., claiming that Stacey and I.T.S. had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and asserting various affirmative defenses. On July 3, 2012, after…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Mantiply v. MantiplySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scarlett v. Air Methods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Merchants Bank v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Cook v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Black Creek Station Homeowner Association Inc v. Rouland Managment Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023
- Intime Staffing, LLC v. Medical Industries of the Americas, Inc. (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.