Legal Opinion

Yoder v. City of Hutchinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 20, 1951No. 38,060, 38,061, 38,062PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The underlying question involved in these appeals is the nature and extent of damages recoverable by a landowner where proceedings in eminent domain under G. S. 1949, 26-201 to 210 inclusive, have been had under the authority of flood control statutes, which, as amended now appear as G. S. 1949, 12-635 to 12-646 inclusive.

Although a more detailed reference is later made to the statutory authority therefor, it suffices here to state that in 1946 the- city of Hutchinson initiated proceedings for the construction of flood control works of some…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Foster v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. State v. HanniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Cow Creek Valley Flood Prevention Ass'n v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Loomis v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Rauscher Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. State Highway Commission v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Kreamer v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API