Legal Opinion

Kirsch v. Meredith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1994No. A93A2223, A93A2224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Kirsch sued Meredith and others for abusive litigation pursuant to OCGA § 51-7-80 et seq., and in Case No. A93A2223 appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Meredith.

Jones and Eastwood, attorneys at law, initially represented Brown and Exclusive Properties, Inc. in a suit against Talkington and others. After Jones and Eastwood withdrew as counsel pursuant to a court order, Kirsch entered as counsel of record for the plaintiffs, and eventually obtained a judgment for the plaintiffs. Subsequently, Kirsch, as attorney for Brown and Exclusive Properties, filed an ac…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Talbert v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Watkins v. M & M Clays, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Paino v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Valles v. SilvermanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Goldsmith v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Baylis v. DaryaniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Davis v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Kirsch v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API