Legal Opinion

Paino v. Connell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1993No. A92A2200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff brought suit, alleging a claim for abusive litigation against appellee-defendants. Appellees answered and subsequently moved for summary judgment. The day before the hearing was held on appellees’ motion, appellant amended his complaint to allege an additional four counts. After conducting the scheduled hearing, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees as to all five counts. Appellant appeals from this order.

1. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for a continuance of the hearing on appellees’ motion.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ingram v. JIK Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Clark v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Peoples Financial Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Talbert v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Clifton v. GillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Covington v. Countryside Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Kirsch v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Automated Solutions Enterprises, Inc. v. Clearvtew Software, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Carroll County Water Authority v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API