Legal Opinion

Baylis v. Daryani

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 2008No. A08A1537PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Chief Judge.

Andrella Baylis and CI², Inc., (collectively “Baylis”), the defendants below, appeal the orders entered in favor of Sam Daryani d/b/a Custom House, Ltd., striking Baylis’s answer, dismissing CI²’s counterclaim, and entering a default judgment against Baylis and CI². Baylis contends the trial court erred by holding that Baylis’s answer was required to comply with the “magic language” contained in OCGA § 9-10-112 2 even though that Code section conflicts with OCGA § 9-11-8 (b) and further contends the trial court erred by dismissing CI²’s counterclaim. Finding no error, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Rider v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Jones v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  5. Howard v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Order Homes, LLC v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. COEN v. APTEAN, INC. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Altacare Corp. v. Decker, Hallman, Barber & Briggs, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. GC Quality Lubricants, Inc. v. Doherty, Duggan & Rouse InsurorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Altacare Corporation v. Decker, Hallman, BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API