Legal Opinion

Crawford County v. Masel

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 27, 2000No. 99-1055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶ 1. Ben Masel appeals from a judgment awarding him attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1994), 1 after he successfully challenged Crawford County's large assembly ordinance. He claims that the circuit court erred in establishing an hourly rate for his attorney's services at $175 per hour because the affidavits before the court demonstrated that the reasonable rate for his attorney was $285 per hour. Because we conclude that the record does not support $175 per hour as a reasonable rate for his attorney's services, we reverse that portion of the judgment and remand this matter to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  2. Lynch v. Crossroads Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. Johnson v. Roma II - Waterford LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. Kuehn v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API