Legal Opinion
State v. Strieff
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 30, 2012No. 20100541-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Judge:
1 1 Edward Joseph Strieff Jr. appeals from his convictions for attempted possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Strieff contends that the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress the evidence underlying these convictions by applying an intervening circum*320stances exception not recognized by Utah law or the Utah Constitution. Because we conclude that the district court applied the proper test and correctly denied the motion to suppress, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
T2 After receiving an anonymous tip that drug activity was occurring…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. MoralezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. StrieffUtah Supreme Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.