Legal Opinion
Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, U.S. Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 4, 1999No. 98-2023PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FUSTÉ, District Judge.
Petitioner/Appellant, Bath Iron Works, Inc., challenges a decision of the Benefits Review Board of the United States Department of Labor Office of Workers’ Compensation holding it responsible for the payment of ongoing medical benefits and a Special Fund assessment pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1986). This case is properly before us pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 921(c). We affirm the Benefits Review Board’s determination.
I
Procedural and Factual History
From 1952 to 1978, Respondent/Appel-lee, Raymond Jones,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Voris v. EikelSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- O'KEEFFE v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carumbo v. Cape Cod S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Commercial Credit Group Inc. v. AMH Logistics, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Urso v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008