Legal Opinion
In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Lands of Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1968No. 1223PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
This is an action for condemnation of land for highway purposes. The land involved is a trapezoid fronting to. the west on Marion Street in the village of Waldo, Marion County, Ohio, which, at the time of taking and for many years prior thereto, was U. S. Route No. 23. The frontage on this street was 134 feet. On the east the property was bounded by a local street known as Portland Street, with a frontage of 46.93 feet. On the north the land was 85 feet deep, and on the south 74.15 feet deep.
The state decided to relocate and improve U. S. Route No. 23 and to do so designed a four-lane…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Board of County Com'rs v. SlaughterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Nelson Et Ux. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Johnson's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Pike County v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wayne Watson Enterprises, LLC v. City of CambridgeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Lands of ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
- Dept. of Natural Resources v. EbbingOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Davisson v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Otr, Unpublished Decision (3-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.