Legal Opinion

Johnson's Petition

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1941No. Appeal, 126PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

The question raised by this appeal is whether, under the circumstances present here, diversion of traffic is an element to be considered in determining the damages due a land owner as a result of the Commonwealth’s taking a portion of a tract of land for the purpose of relocating a road, under the provisions of the so-called “Sproul Act” of May 31,1911, P. L. 168, as amended (36 PS §61). The land owner, on appeal from an award of viewers, secured a judgment and the Commonwealth has appealed from the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial.

Dean L. Johnson,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Nelson Et Ux. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Heil v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Pittsburgh, Bradford & Buffalo Railway Co. v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Iron City Automobile Co. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Board of County Com'rs v. SlaughterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Gilleland v. New York State Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Creasy v. StevensDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API