Lucius W. Stockton and Daniel Moore, in Error v. Harriet Bishop
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
45 U.S. 155
4 How. 155
11 L.Ed. 918
LUCIUS W. STOCKTON AND DANIEL MOORE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
HARRIET BISHOP.
January Term, 1846
1
THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for West Pennsylvania.
2
There was no bill of exceptions signed by the judge, and the record presented the following appearance.
3
Among the rolls, records, and judicial proceedings of the Circuit Court of the United States, in and for the Western District of Pennsylvania, in the Third Circuit, may be found the following words and figures, to wit:——
Copy of Docket Entries.
4
McCandless,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Catron.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Renner v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Ex parte BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1823
- Williams v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Nelson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.