Marquette Venture Partners II v. Leonesio
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 The plaintiffs, Marquette Venture Partners II, L.P., and MVP II Affiliates Fund, L.P. (collectively “Marquette”), challenge Frank Leonesio’s (“Leonesio”) 1 cross-appeal claims. Specifically, Marquette argues that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2102(C) (2003) precludes our review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury verdict when an Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 50(a) 2 motion was not followed by a post-verdict Rule 50(b) motion. . Because we agree, we grant Marquette’s motion to partially dismiss the cross-appeal. 3
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Tortu v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heritage v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Phoenician Equity v. DreambrandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Pino-Alvarez v. ErlichmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- STITH v. BELLA VITA HEALTHCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
- Wales v. AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020