Legal Opinion

Marquette Venture Partners II v. Leonesio

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 3, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 09-0166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 The plaintiffs, Marquette Venture Partners II, L.P., and MVP II Affiliates Fund, L.P. (collectively “Marquette”), challenge Frank Leonesio’s (“Leonesio”) 1 cross-appeal claims. Specifically, Marquette argues that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2102(C) (2003) precludes our review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury verdict when an Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 50(a) 2 motion was not followed by a post-verdict Rule 50(b) motion. . Because we agree, we grant Marquette’s motion to partially dismiss the cross-appeal. 3

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Tortu v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heritage v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. Phoenician Equity v. DreambrandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
  3. Pino-Alvarez v. ErlichmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. STITH v. BELLA VITA HEALTHCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
  5. Wales v. AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API