Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. Sandoval

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1981No. 15063PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer the following question on appeal: Does the parental immunity doctrine, as it presently exists in Arizona, bar a suit by a minor child against his parents for negligence in leaving a gate open through which the minor child drove his tricycle and was injured by a passing automobile?

Since summary judgment was granted to the defendants, we will review the facts and the record in a light most…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Briere v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  4. Hebel v. Hebel Ex Rel. HebelAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Streenz v. StreenzArizona Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Jilani by and Through Jilani v. JilaniTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dellapenta v. DellapentaWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Broadwell Ex Rel. Broadwell v. HolmesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API