State v. Day
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WEBBER, Justice.
In these two cases tried together the defendants were convicted of grand larceny. The evidence disclosed that they were observed forcibly removing copper lightning rod cable from a dwelling house and shortly after were apprehended with a quantity of such cable in their truck. This conviction is before us on appeal.
It is first contended that since the State has failed to show any lapse of time between the severance of the cable from the realty to which it was affixed and the asportation thereof from the owner’s premises, no larceny has been shown but at most a trespass. Our…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Commonwealth v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- State v. SorrentinoWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Corlew v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Shields v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MatzkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. ThibeaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. GwinnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.