Legal Opinion

Corlew v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1944PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Plaintiff in error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction of grand larceny, with a maximum sentence of three years. Larceny is by statute graded into grand and petit. “Grand larceny is the felonious taking and carrying away personal goods over the value of sixty dollars, and petit larceny, of goods not exceeding in value sixty dollars.” Code, Section 10921. And, “The punishment for grand larceny is imprison ment in the penitentiary not less than three nor more than ten years; and for petit larceny, not less than one nor more than five years. ’ ’ Code, Sec. 10925.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Chapple v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Mayfield v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cowan v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Durham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Smith v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bullard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Jamison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API