Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Cohen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 1951No. 300PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Cohen has petitioned me for bail pending his appeal in this court of appeals from sentences on counts one, three, five and six of an indictment of which he was adjudged guilty by the district court. To secure such bail, Cohen must show a substantial question with respect to error in his convictions for the consideration of this court. Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 46(a)(2), 18 .U.S.C. Since the sentences, each for five years, are concurrent, it is necessary that as to each there is shown such a substantial question. Danziger v. United States, 9 Cir., 161 F.2d 299; Lowden v. United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. NoveckSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Danziger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Charles Nelson Co. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Bryan v. AraiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. RayorDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1962
- United States v. Evan Raymond DaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- The United States of America v. Joseph IaculloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Michael (Micky) Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.