Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Arai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1933No. 7004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
A majority of the Board of Special Inquiry voted to admit appellee; on a dissenting member’s appeal to the Secretary of Labor, taken under Act of February 5, 1917, c. 29, § 17, 39 Stat. 887, U. S. C. title 8, § 153 (8 USCA § 153), appellee was ordered excluded.
In the District Court, on the hearing pursuant to an order to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus should not issue, appellee was ordered discharged from the custody of the immigration authorities.. On this appeal, an interesting question is presented as to the scope of the reviewing power of the Secretary of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Keyser v. FarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. BurroughsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Ex Parte CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Dang Nam v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935