Legal Opinion
Charles Nelson Co. v. Curtis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1924No. 4180PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
On August 30, 1922, Thomas S. Curtis, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, commenced an action on the law side of the District Court to recover damages from the Charles Nelson Company, the owner of the barkentine Mary Winkleman, for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while serving as a seaman on board said vessel. It was alleged that the injuries were caused solely by the negligence of the defendant, its officers and agents.
The suit was brought under section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of June 5, 1920 (41 Stat. 1007 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Waring v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Complaint of the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- WE HEDGER TRANSP. CORPORATION v. GallottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Kunschman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Red Bluff Bay Fisheries, Inc. v. JurjevCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Ex Parte CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.