Legal Opinion

Eyeington v. Pardee

New York County Courts

Decided March 21, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is a motion for judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon.

The complaint alleges a cause of action upon a bond and mortgage secured by certain real property in this county. These instruments were made and sealed by the defendants *804Pardee on December 15, 1928, and the principal sum to be paid thereby became due on May 1, 1934, the last payment having been made on April 9, 1934.

This action was commenced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Rochester Savings Bank v. Stoeltzen & Tapper, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Futherer v. AngelidisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heller v. SheftmanNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API