Legal Opinion

Futherer v. Angelidis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the twenty-year, and not the six-year, Statute of Limitations applies to the cause of action set forth in the complaint. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 47, 48; Atlantic Dock Co. v. Leavitt, 54 N. Y. 35; Bowen v. Beck, 94 id. 86; Hyde v. Miller, 45 App. Div. 396; Quackenbush v. Mapes, No. 1, 123 id. 242; Hulbert v. Clark, 57 Hun, 558; affd., 128 N. Y. 295; Greenly v. Greenly, 114 App. Div. 640; Anguish v. Blair, 160 id. 52; affd., 216 N. Y. 746.) All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hulbert v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Atlantic Dock Co. v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Greenley v. GreenleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Hyde v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Hulbert v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Onondaga County Savings Bank v. Markson Bros., New York County Courts1941
  2. Eyeington v. Pardee, New York County Courts1945
  3. Ernst v. SchaackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API