Legal Opinion
Rochester Savings Bank v. Stoeltzen & Tapper, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
The action is to recover interest on a bond secured by mortgage on real estate. On November 1, 1920, Bertha Norwich and Adam Norwich gave their bond and mortgage to the plaintiff. Thereafter they gave their bond and second mortgage covering the same premises to one Alvah F. Stahl, which was subsequently foreclosed. The purchaser at the foreclosure sale was Joseph H. Oberlies. Defendants Albert Link and Anthony Link, Jr., for a reason which does not appear, joined with Oberlies in the execution and delivery to the plaintiff of a bond for the payment of the indebtedness represented by the said…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gilbert v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Marshall v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Johnson v. MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- President of Georgetown College v. MaddenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Schwonke v. BanisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Rochester Savings Bank v. Stoeltzen & Tapper, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1941
- Eyeington v. Pardee, New York County Courts1945