Legal Opinion
New Destiny Development Corp. v. Piccione
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 11, 1992No. 3:91CV00429 (AHN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEVAS, District Judge.
New Destiny Development Corp., Paul Limone, Eugene O’Neill, Liberty Properties, LTD., and Liberty Property Associates Limited Partnership (collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”) bring this action against Samuel Piccione, Jr., and Scalesse, Scalesse and Piccione (collectively referred to as “defendants”). This action arises over a property foreclosure suit initiated in state court by the defendants and their recording of a lis pendens giving notice of that foreclosure action pursuant to Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-325 (1991 Supp.)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gem Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Diaz v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Geller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002