Legal Opinion

Rome Industrial Insurance v. Eidson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 18, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action upon insurance policy. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. July 5, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Where a policy of insurance contained the provision, “Should this policy become void in consequence of non-payment of premium, it may be revived, if not more than fifty-two premiums are due, upon payment of all arrears and the presentation of evidence satisfactory to the company of the sound health of the insured,” the insured acquired a contract right to revive the policy, after a lapse, upon complying with the conditions. Upon compliance with such conditions the insurer is bound to act with reasonable promptness and fairness in passing upon the application, and to notify the insured of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rome Industrial Insurance v. EidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Leonard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Life Casualty Co. of Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Steiner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Longino v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. McWilliams v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API