Pederson v. Gould
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
The lower court consolidated the appellant wife’s medical malpractice action and the appellant husband’s action for loss of consortium and medical expenses. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the respondent doctor in both cases. We affirm.
The respondent gynecologist performed a vaginal hysterectomy on the wife. She subsequently developed problems. A gastroenterologist diagnosed a blockage of the ureter and referred the wife to a urologist to correct the problem. Subsequently, a cystoscope was performed and a stitch was found in or around her left ureter. The wife later…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Green v. LilliewoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Thomas v. BerriosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Cox Ex Rel. Estate of Cox v. LundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Cianbro Corp. v. Jeffcoat and MartinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.