Legal Opinion

Pederson v. Gould

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 1986No. 22505PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

The lower court consolidated the appellant wife’s medical malpractice action and the appellant husband’s action for loss of consortium and medical expenses. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the respondent doctor in both cases. We affirm.

The respondent gynecologist performed a vaginal hysterectomy on the wife. She subsequently developed problems. A gastroenterologist diagnosed a blockage of the ureter and referred the wife to a urologist to correct the problem. Subsequently, a cystoscope was performed and a stitch was found in or around her left ureter. The wife later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Green v. LilliewoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Thomas v. BerriosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Cox Ex Rel. Estate of Cox v. LundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Cianbro Corp. v. Jeffcoat and MartinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API