Legal Opinion
Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2004No. 03-15045PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1077TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Darlene Jespersen, a bartender at Harrah’s Casino in Reno, Nevada, brought this Title VII action alleging that her employer’s policy requiring that certain female employees wear makeup discriminates against her on the basis of sex. The district court granted summary judgment for Harrah’s, holding that its policy did not constitute sex discrimination because it imposed equal burdens on both sexes. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
The following facts are undisputed. Darlene Jespersen was a bartender at the sports bar in Harrah’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Christopher Vickers v. Fairfield Medical Center, Steve Anderson, Kory J. Dixon, John Mueller, and "Jane Doe" DixonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Schroer v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.