Legal Opinion

Ricklin v. Smith

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1983No. 80CA0452PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

In this comparative negligence action arising from a vehicle-pedestrian accident, a jury verdict was entered finding plaintiff-pedestrian to be 67% negligent and defendant-driver 33% negligent. Because he recovered nothing under such a distribution of percentage contribution, plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Plaintiff sued the driver for negligent operation of her car. The driver raised contributory negligence as an affirmative defense. At the conclusion of the evidence, the plaintiff moved the court for a “directed verdict” against the driver. The court,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nettrour v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Barker v. Colorado Reg.-Sports Car Club of Am., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Mitchell v. Allstate Insurance CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. ChilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. HeinzColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Pulliam v. DreilingColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Watson v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API