Legal Opinion

Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. Chiles

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1911No. 6321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Larimer. District Court — Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

This appeal is from a judgment for $3,050 entered in favor of the plaintiff below, upon the verdict of a jury. Fifty dollars thereof was for furniture, and the balance for the death of plaintiff ’s son, who was injured at a railway crossing on Sixth street in Loveland. Several tracks ran north and south across the street. The first, on the east side, was called the house track, and the second, the main track. Over all the tracks, and along the middle line of Sixth street, there was a plank crossing wide enough to accommodate vehicles. Sixth street ran east and west and was a much used…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Thompson v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Morris v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swanson v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Headley v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  3. Ricklin v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Goll v. FowlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Smith v. McCabeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API