Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic Marking

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1996No. S-94-1032Published

1ConcurrenceGerrard, J.

I agree with the rule announced by the majority regarding the circumstances under which apportionment of fault must be submitted to the jury, and I concur in the result of the instant case. *159However, I write separately to address the propriety and effect of the trial court’s directed verdict of Traphagan’s negligence.

This court has long held that a motorist is deemed negligent as a matter of law if he or she operates a motor vehicle in such a manner as to be unable to stop or turn aside without colliding with an object or obstruction in the motorist’s path within his or her range of vision.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re Interest of RRNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Niedbalski v. CuchnaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Nickell v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ashby v. First Data Resources, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API