Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic Marking
Nebraska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceGerrard, J.
I agree with the rule announced by the majority regarding the circumstances under which apportionment of fault must be submitted to the jury, and I concur in the result of the instant case. *159However, I write separately to address the propriety and effect of the trial court’s directed verdict of Traphagan’s negligence.
This court has long held that a motorist is deemed negligent as a matter of law if he or she operates a motor vehicle in such a manner as to be unable to stop or turn aside without colliding with an object or obstruction in the motorist’s path within his or her range of vision.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Interest of RRNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Niedbalski v. CuchnaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Nickell v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ashby v. First Data Resources, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.