State v. Taunt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Tbe defendant was convicted in tbe district court for Hennepin county, upon an indictment for grand larceny, and moved for a new trial upon a bill of exceptions. This appeal is taken from tbe order of the district court refusing a new trial. Tbe case is fully stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
Ripley, Ch. J.
The indictment charges that the defendant "did steal, take and carry away divers and sundry genuine and current treasury notes, of different denominations, issued by the treasury department of the United States, and divers and sundry genuine and current bank notes, of different denominations, issued by different and sundry national banks, organized under the laws of the United States, all of which treasury notes and bank notes amounted to the sum of, and were of the value of two hundred and fifty dollars, and were the property of one Joseph Smythyman; a more…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haskins v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Low v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bailey v. GalpinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- McQueen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Wilkins v. BevierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.