McQueen v. State

It is contended that the information upon which the appellants were tried and convicted of the crime of robbery does not sufficiently describe the property alleged to have been feloniously taken from the person upon whom the offence was committed. The description reads thus: “ One note, circulating as money, of the denomination and value of ten dollars, a more particular description of which note is to' this affiant unknown and can not be given; one note, circulating as money, of the denomination and value of five dollars, a more particular description of which is unknown and *73can not be…