Legal Opinion

Cott v. Jacklin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1924No. 4077PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

In January, 1921, plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Salt Lake county against the defendant to recover damages for an alleged breach of the covenants of warranty and for quiet enjoyment.

The plaintiff, in his complaint, sets forth the necessary facts respecting the conveyance of certain real estate by the defendant to one Christopherson and the conveyance of said real estate by said Christopherson to the plaintiff; the covenants of warranty and the breach thereof; the eviction of plaintiff from a part of the premises conveyed, and the damages including costs and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Swartz v. BallouSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Hazelett v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Miller v. DesvergesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Wright v. NippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Neeley v. KelschUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Espinoza v. Safeco Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gallegos v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  5. East Canyon Land & Stock Co. v. Davis & Weber Counties Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API