Legal Opinion · Dissent

Saiz Ex Rel. Waite v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1971No. 603Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The City of Albuquerque relied upon §§ 64-25-8 and 9, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 9, pt. 2) to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint because the City was immune from suit. On this basis, the trial court dismissed the complaint against the City with prejudice.

Section 64-25-9 is unconstitutional. The title of the Act, Laws 1941, ch. 192, reads as follows:

An Act Authorizing the State Board of Finance to Direct the Purchase of Ptiblic Liability and Property Damage Insurance Upon All Cars Owned and Operated by the State of New Mexico

The title only authorized the purchase of insurance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fullen v. FullenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Mitchell v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. DesGeorges v. GraingerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API