Legal Opinion

Kennebunk, Kennebunkport & Wells Water District v. Maine Turnpike Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 9, 1950PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrill, J.

On exceptions. This is an action on; the case instituted by Kennebunk, Kennebunkport and Wells Water District, hereinafter called the District, against Maine Turnpike Authority, hereinafter called the Authority. The District is a body politic and corporate created by the Legislature of this State for the purpose of supplying water to towns and individuals within its territorial limits. P. & S. L., 1921, Chap. 159. The Authority is a body politic and corporate created in like manner for the purpose of constructing and operating a turnpike from a point at or near Kittery to a point at or near…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Canal Commissioners v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Staples v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Lockwood Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  4. St. Helena Water Co. v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Bailey v. Inhabitants of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Foss v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Stanton v. Trustees of St. Joseph's CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Matter of DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Reynolds v. W. H. Hinman Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  5. Nelson v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API