Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McCall v. Waer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*309OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

Elizabeth McCall and her husband, W. H. McCall, sued Carolyn Waer and Richard Waer, in companion suits, for personal injuries allegedly received by Mrs. McCall in an automobile collision, and medical expenses, loss of services and consortium suffered by W. H. McCall as a result of Mrs. McCall’s injuries. The Waers admitted that their negligence had caused the accident, but denied that Mrs. McCall had sustained the injuries she alleged: a fractured rib, and neck and back injuries. Mrs. McCall’s proof was to the effect that the accident either activated and aggravated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Fisch v. MangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kaiser v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Collins v. Summers Hardware and Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. Gregory Lee Boggs v. Dinah K. RheaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. Millison v. ClarkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API