Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rea v. Fornan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1942No. Nos. 3295, 3300, 3301, 3302PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBy Barnes, J.

The above-entitled cases are now being determined de novo by reason of separate appeals on questions of law and fact from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio.

By stipulation it is agreed that the transcript of docket and journal entries, original papers and transcript of evidence as filed in a single case may be considered as filed in each of the separate appeals without the necessity of making and filing separate transcripts, original papers, etc.

In effect, this means that the several appeals are consolidated and one opinion shall be determinative of each and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boulden v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hopkins v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Mitchell v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Schuchart v. SchuchartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MaynardOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Fancher v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Marriage of Barbosa-Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Kimmel v. DotyOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API