Bradley v. Vail
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Debt on a bond of recognizance for costs; brought to the Court of Common Pleas of Fairfield County, and tried to the jury on the general issue before Sail, J. Verdict for the plaintiff, and motion for a new trial by the defendant for errors in the rulings and charge of the court. The case is fully ^stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.
This was an action of debt upon a bond of recognizance alleged to have been entered into by Martin K. Osborne, the defendant’s intestate, before the Superior Court for Eairfield County, for the prosecution of an action in that court, in which one Henry B. Osborne was plaintiff and the present plaintiff was defendant. The cause was tried to the jury in the Court of Common Pleas upon the plea of the general issue, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Upon the trial the plaintiff offered in evidence a document signed by the assistant clerk of the Superior Court for Eairfield…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mix v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
- Gregory v. ShermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Beers v. BroomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Barton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- International Tool & Gauge Co. v. BorgSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Caulfield v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Continental Life Insurance v. BarberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.