Legal Opinion
In Re Heimerle
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1992No. CR 90-1051 (S-1)Published
1Opinion of the Court
788 F.Supp. 700 (1992)
In re Subpoena of James HEIMERLE.
UNITED STATES
v.
John GOTTI and Frank Locascio, Defendants.
No. CR 90-1051 (S-1).
United States District Court, E.D. New York.
March 19, 1992.
Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., John Gleeson, Asst. U.S. Atty., for U.S.
Albert J. Krieger, Miami, Fla., for John Gotti.
John W. Mitchell, LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross, New York City, Anthony M. Cardinale, Boston, Mass., for Frank Locascio.
Christine E. Yaris, New York City, for James Heimerle.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
James Heimerle moves to quash a subpoena commanding him to appear as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.