Legal Opinion

Hulmes v. Keel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1939No. Appeals, 182 and 210PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Barnes,

This suit was instituted to recover damages for injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff as a result of an accident in which an automobile operated by the defendant was involved. The accident occurred on Ogontz Avenue south of its intersection with Walnut Lane, in the City of Philadelphia. Ogontz Avenue is a two-way street, sixty feet wide from curb to curb, and extends north and south, with a double set of trolley tracks thereon.

On the afternoon of December 16,1936, a man dressed as Santa Claus was distributing candy to children on the east sidewalk of Ogontz…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Purdy v. HazeltineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Niziolek v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Engle v. SpinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Lescznski v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API