Legal Opinion

San Bernardino City Unified School District v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1987No. E003574PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEWS, J.

By this proceeding, petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order denying their motion to set a cross-complaint for trial before the expiration of the three-year period allowed for that purpose by Code of Civil Procedure section 583.320, subdivision (a)(3).

We issued an alternative writ of mandate and stayed the trial until compliance with the alternative writ or until further order of this court. We now examine the totality of the relevant circumstances to determine if respondent’s denial of the motion was an abuse of discretion. We conclude…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Brown v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Beswick v. Palo Verde Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosevear v. RosevearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Tejada v. BlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Freedman v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Ladd v. Dart Equipment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Wong v. DavidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API