Legal Opinion

Duke v. Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 27, 2024No. 2:21-cv-06072Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Janet Duke, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -v- 2:21-cv-6072 (NJC) (AYS) Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp., Oakley, Inc., Luxottica Group ERISA Plans Compliance & Investment Committee, and Luxottica Group Pension Plan, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER NUSRAT J. CHOUDHURY, District Judge: Plaintiff Janet Duke (“Duke”) brings this action on behalf of herself and other similarly situated individuals against Defendants Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. (“Luxottica”); Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”); Luxottica Group ERISA…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API