Legal Opinion
Chatman v. County of Santa Clara
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 27, 1997No. 95-16857Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
107 F.3d 15
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Vaughn R. CHATMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; Santa Clara County Superior Court of
California; Office of the District Attorney for Santa Clara
County; Santa Clara County Department of Corrections;
Santa Clara County Probation Department; Robert Conroy;
George Kennedy; Christine Hudson; Stacy Kasheverof; David
Soares…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Williams v. HorvathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McDougal v. County of ImperialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.