Legal Opinion

Carvalho v. Grzankowski

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided August 6, 2014No. Case No. 5:12-cv-194PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Renee and Scott Grzankowski (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 36.) In this negligence action, Plaintiff Carrie Carvalho alleges that, over the course of a weekend at Defendants’ residences, she was injured as a result of Defendants’ failure to exercise reasonable control over their puppy.

Defendants contend they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the undisputed facts reveal that their puppy exhibited…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Collier v. ZambitoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Carmella M. Pinto v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barone v. CotaVermont Superior Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API