Legal Opinion

Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc. v. Chandler

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1960No. Civ. 24250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

Appeal is taken herein by plaintiffs Edward Sidebotham and Son, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Sidebotham), Alfred C. Mueller and C. E. Christopher, from a judgment entered herein in favor of Charles W. Shepard, defendant, and Linden H. Chandler and Chandler’s Palos Verdes Sand and Gravel Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Chandler Company), defendants and respondents. Sidebotham is a corporation in the business of producing and selling sand and gravel with outstanding one class capital stock of 1,000 shares. The by-laws provide for three directors to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Boericke v. WeiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Greiss v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Milton v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Olincy v. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Garnier v. GarnierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Milton v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API