Legal Opinion

Cooper v. State Ex Rel. Leedy, Co. Atty.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1912No. 2255PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Brror from Bilis County Court; A. B. Williams, Judge. Proceedings in bastardy by the State, on the relation of C. B. Eeedy, County Attorney of Ellis County, against Nathan Cooper. .The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the court charged the defendant with maintenance in the sum of $800, payable in annual installments, from which he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The petition in error is filed in this court upon the assumption that a bastardy proceeding is in the nature of a civil action, and that therefore this court has jurisdiction of the appeal from the county court. ' We assume, without deciding, that this is true (Bell v. Territory of Oklahoma, 8 Okla. 75, 56 Pac. 853; In re Comstock, 10 Okla. 299, 61 Pac. 921), and confine our decision within as narrow limits as possible, waiving any discussion of several intricate questions that-might have been raised.

The principal question which it is necessary to pass upon i-s whether a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. In Re ComstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Crismon v. Barse Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Hobart v. School District No. 56Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Hodgins v. NoyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Halton v. State Ex Rel. LasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API