Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Hull Dye & Print, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 21, 1995No. 13736PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.

This appeal comes before this court on essentially two issues: (1) whether the compensation review board (board) properly dismissed the plaintiffs appeal because she had failed to assert a claim for dependent’s benefits pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 31-294,1 and (2) whether the board properly *719dismissed the plaintiffs appeal because she failed to file a timely appeal to the board pursuant to General Statutes § 31-301 (a).2 Because the board did not make the necessary factual determinations to resolve the timeliness issue, we remand the case without considering the substantive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Chzrislonk v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Conaci v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Wheeler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Vega v. Waltsco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Cyr v. Domino's PizzaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API