Freeman v. Hull Dye & Print, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
This appeal comes before this court on essentially two issues: (1) whether the compensation review board (board) properly dismissed the plaintiffs appeal because she had failed to assert a claim for dependent’s benefits pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 31-294,1 and (2) whether the board properly *719dismissed the plaintiffs appeal because she failed to file a timely appeal to the board pursuant to General Statutes § 31-301 (a).2 Because the board did not make the necessary factual determinations to resolve the timeliness issue, we remand the case without considering the substantive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Chzrislonk v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Conaci v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Wheeler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Vega v. Waltsco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Cyr v. Domino's PizzaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.