Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dye v. Pierce

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 2006No. 4-05-1035PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN

delivered the opinion of the court:

In October 2005, plaintiff, Kenneth R. Dye, an inmate at Pontiac Correctional Center, pro se filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which he alleged that defendants, Guy D. Pierce (Pontiac’s warden), Roger E. Walker (the Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (DOC)), Melody Ford, Robert Ellinger, Erika Howard, Annabelle Motteler, Wesley G. Wiles, Brian Fairchild, Jeff Yusko, and Chris May-back (DOC employees), violated his due-process rights in prison-disciplinary proceedings arising out of a March 2005 incident at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hatch v. SzymanskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Helm v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Armstrong v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Cannon v. QuinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jeryme Morgan v. Minh SchottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. McCready v. Illinois Secretary of StateAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Ford v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Knox v. GodinezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Knox v. GodinezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API